Re: Help, Dad Needs "Convincing" To Go Dodge!!

From: Tom Slick North (prodog@swbell.net)
Date: Fri Feb 14 2003 - 08:54:28 EST


the Cummins has more than 20% less parts than the Powerstroke, is more fuel
efficient, and will last longer...

Plus, It's cheaper to maintain than the Powerstrokes....

Later!

Tom "Slick" North
96 Dodge Dakota 5.2L RC

----- Original Message -----
From: <Olznut@aol.com>
To: <aol@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:36 AM
Subject: DML: Help, Dad Needs "Convincing" To Go Dodge!!

>
> My Dad is going to buy a new truck to replace his trusty '91 F-150. He's
> gonna buy one as well as a large 5th wheel travel trailer to do some
> traveling (he's a retired CHP Officer) Anyways, we're looking at about
10-13k
> lbs trailer weight, but he's looking at the new Ford Power Stroke. I'm
trying
> to get him into a Ram 3500 single rear wheel, he does not want a dually or
a
> crew cab, just a extra cab. He's really set on that new Ford/IH diesel,
but
> what can I tell him to sway him at Dodge? I keep saying Cummins= Big Rigs
but
> all he says is that the Cummins is noisy, gutless, blah blah. I was told
the
> new Cummins is alot quieter. Is this true? Please give me some ammo to get
> him to switch!! I don't know much about the Rams, but I DO NOT want him
into
> another Ford.
>
> Ed "Olznut" Halterman Sunland, Ca '01 Dakota Quad Cab SLT+ 4.7L 4x4
"Silver
> Streak" '66 Olds F-85 330 V-8, Intense Blue "Project Olds" Will Be
Finished
> Sometime This Millenium!! See Them Here!!
> http://community.webtv.net/OLZNUT/WelcometoOlznuts
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:45:50 EST