RE: Re: HEMI Ram 1500 v. Dakota R/T

From: Gabriel A. Couriel (BigGabe@fiufiji.com)
Date: Tue Feb 18 2003 - 23:12:54 EST


don't know about that... but with the new "hydro-formed" chassis, and it
being a regular cab, the 95 HP should cover the additional weight. we've
seen old-styled Ram's running 13's (Normally Aspirated) on the 5.9L... given
some time, a HEMI could do that and more... of course, by then there should
hopefully be a Dakota SRT-8 to push the balance back toward the Dak.

Gabriel A. Couriel

E-mail:
gcouriel@bellsouth.net <mailto:gcouriel@bellsouth.net>
Biggabe@fiufiji.com <mailto:Biggabe@fiufiji.com>
gcouri01@fiu.edu <mailto:gcouri01@fiu.edu>

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net]On Behalf Of Punch
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 4:01 PM
To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
Subject: DML: Re: HEMI Ram 1500 v. Dakota R/T

what about the weight difference?

punch



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:45:51 EST