RE: Durango R/T

From: Stlaurent Mr Steven (STLAURENTS@MCTSSA.USMC.MIL)
Date: Fri Feb 21 2003 - 11:10:31 EST


Save your money.

The new Durango information will be passed to the dealership in July.

The new Durango is larger and can hold real people in the rear back seats.
Also, a new engine for the R/T will be the 5.7 Hemi.

--------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
C4I System Engineer
Engineering Branch, PSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, U.S. Marine Corps
Office (760) 725-2506 (DSN Prefix: 365)
"Information learn is power for the intellectual mind...".

-----Original Message-----
From: Got MoPar ? aar.mopar.cc [mailto:maark@wrlc.org]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 7:16 AM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: DML: Durango R/T

Brief intro:

I'm Mark Johnson (AKA MoparMaark), I was on this list a few years back
when I had a '92 Dak. I dropped off shortly after my son totaled it ;-(.
Well
now I'm back, and I am looking into buying a Durango. The new ones are
a bit out of my range so I am looking for a used 2000-2002 R/T with around
20k miles. My question for the list is...is the Durango R/T all hype (my
friend had
a Dak R/T and loved it!) or is it worth the effort to locate one. Would I
be just
as well off with a well equipped 5.9 Durango? The dealer is playing up the
4.7, claiming it's down 10 HP but has more torque down low. The numbers
show the 5.9 having a lot more torque. What's the real world difference,
seems
to me if the 4.7 was so hot, they'd use it in the R/T?

FYI, I need the Durango for a trip we are planning this August to Alaska,
from
Pasadena Maryland and back! Any complaints about long distance traveling
in a Durango?

Thanks!

Mark Johnson (mAARk) Pasadena, Maryland.
2001 PT Cruiser Deep Cranberry Pearl, Limited Edition, Xenon body kit,
On order: Borla stainless cat-back duals, Eibach lowering springs.
1940 Chrysler Royal Coupe,440/auto, 6-Pack, long term project.
See my cars and my huge AAR gallery @ http://aar.mopar.cc (Thanks Chris!)



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:45:51 EST