Yeah, is the heads that suck on those motors, I cant remember. I was
looking into buying one at one point in time... god I love they way they
look. I can see where the 2.6 would be nicer witht the longer stroke and
all, and then turbo as well... Oh, what is the Knight Rider kit? Sounds
interesting.
TJ
dakota52318@toad.net
1992 Dodge Dakota 4X4
Long Bed, 318, 46RH Auto
DT Headers, Functional RamAir Hood
K&N FIPK, Flowmaster Muffler
Custom Throttle Body
MP Computer
15.74@87.59
4350lbs
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Meyerhoff" <mike@mypants.org>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: DML: Re: Dodge, Daytona, Iroc, Shelby
>
> No electrical problems on mine other than the horrible job a previous
owner
> did at installing a "Knight Rider" kit. They shouldda used larger wire on
> some of the circuits, so they do have voltage drop problems if everything
> isn't working right.
> The 2.0 is good motor... easy to modify for power, but it doesn't have as
> much potential as the 2.6. Getting the 2.6 to run strong can be tricky,
but
> thats half the fun.
> mm
>
> > Any electrical problems? I heard that they are prone to them.....
> > absolutely AEWSOME looking car though. There have been a few 2.0 (DSM
> > engine) conversions done to them.
> >
> > > couldn't find anything local in the shape/price range i was after...
> > > I settled for a 88 Chrysler Conquest! Its 2.6 Turbo'd RWD 3040lbs.
> Neat
> > > little car, rare, and torqy (3.9" stroke).
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:05 EST