Hehehehe...talk to the guys running 10's and 11's with SD and MAF
systems with these boxes.
- Bernd
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Bob Mankin
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 6:59 PM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: Re: DML: #24 FMS Injectors
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Berry" <coolva1@cox.net>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: DML: #24 FMS Injectors
>
> Have you thought of playing w/ a SAFC? you can adjust the injectors
> +/-
50%
> in 500RPM intervals at 8 points... I'll be using one on the truck
> when
its
> running again to control the 24# injectors w/ the cam... hell, I may
> try runnin 30# injectors... (lookin at 500RWHP) :-P
>
> Tim Berry - Chesapeake, VA
> 97 Dakota CC 360 Auto 4300lbs
> best ET to date: 13.03@103.76
> 355.8RWHP 395.2RWTQ
> 99 Neon R/T Daily Driver
Part of the problem there is the internal maps in the PCM are 16 cells
wide as opposed to the 8 in that aftermarket box, so you don't get a
clean overlay. The PCM will switch values twice for each ajustment point
on the SAFC, so it will always be a compromise.
Most of the stand alone controllers like the F.A.S.T., Accel,
Electromotive also work on 16 cell wide tables(32 in some of the latest
stuff). At 8 cells this box is a bit too primitive, IMO.
The factory maps are also not linear, another curve ball in the picture.
If you set that thing up to change at consistent 500 rpm increments, the
mid-range will likely be a mess due to the mismatch.
Bob
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:09 EST