RE: Re: Lowering Components

From: Jeff Durling (jdurling@bellsouth.net)
Date: Thu Apr 03 2003 - 09:13:25 EST


They make nothing for the gen II. Western chassis has been found to be
one of the better setups for the gen II daks. They make both spindles
and rear hangers.

Jeff Durling

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of
JAMEPC@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 11:27 PM
To: aol@dakota-truck.net
Subject: Re: DML: Re: Lowering Components

I looked at Hotchkis web site and they don't list anything for a Gen II
Dakota. Do they not make them or just not list them? Anyone have
Hotchkis
on their Gen II?
Thanks,
James

In a message dated 4/2/2003 11:05:46 PM Eastern Standard Time,
jbattles@bankfinancial.com writes:

> Hotchkis springs and Hotchkis valved Bilsteins is what I've heard is
best
> for the Dak. I've got some custom units from Total Control Products
on my
> '66 Mustang and they are by far some of the very best shocks I've ever
> used...if they weren't so damn expensive, but then everything from
Total
> Control is. You may want to look into what/if they have available for
your
> year Dak. I went with Hotchkis on my Dak b/c they make one hell of a
good
> product as well.....the setup for the Dak is going in on Friday, I'll
post
> some reactions after I drive the hell out of it this weekend.
>
> --
> -Josh
> 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
>
>
> <JAMEPC@aol.com> wrote in message
news:151.1dcc6842.2bbcfdb6@aol.com...
> >
> >I need some advise on quality 2" drop coils for a gen II Dakota. I
know
> it's
> >not the best way to drop (as opposed to control arms or spindles) but
I
> need
> >new springs anyways so this would be the most efficient. I already
> replaced
> >the worn stock springs with 2" drop el-cheapos and they are to wide!
They
> >rub the edges of the control arms and make loud, annoying poping
noisesas
> the
> >spring moves up and down in them. I also need opinions on quality
drop
> >shocks.
> >Thanks,
> >James
> >
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:09 EST