I'd probably be up for that...depending on the numbers (price and additional ponies :)
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Battles [mailto:jbattles@bankfinancial.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 10:57 AM
To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
Subject: Re: DML: Superchips programmer for 3.9/5.2/5.9
OK. That makes more sense now, thatnks for the lesson Bob! Maybe we (the
DML) can organize a group buy for the programmer when it comes out... that
would be cool. I'd love to get some more ponies out of my little V6.
-- - Josh Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L""Bob Mankin"" <bob@coralfarms.com> wrote in message news:008701c313e4$29a2eb40$6401a8c0@BOBHOME... > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net > > [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net]On Behalf Of Josh > > Battles > > Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 7:45 AM > > To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net > > Subject: Re: DML: Superchips programmer for 3.9/5.2/5.9 > > > > > > > > What kind of program changes can be achieved with this > > device? I'm looking > > for different timing, more advance, a slightly different fuel > > map, changing > > my shift points, and the like. Have you heard if this will > > be possible? > > Additionally, what has been done so that the chrysler PCM > > doesn't "learn" > > over your new program? I remember reading on the boards that > > there was a > > problem with that on the V8's. > > > > -- > > - Josh > > Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L > > Josh, the adaptive working around the tune is not an issue here because > instead of a signal hack or modify of a subset of signals, this is an > entirely new program that gets uploaded to your PCM. The first step of the > reprogram is to zero out your existing flash, then an upload of a brand new > optimized program takes place. Since the program is optimized(read many > hours of dyno tuning) the fuel and spark maps are spot on for a stock truck > and they have or will have some programs for some of the lighter bolt-on > mods Dakota owners typically use(headers, CAI, etc). A very clean solution > overall with excellent results. Sorry, I don't think tranny shift points are > part of the feature set. Rev limiters can be moved though. > > The problems you are referring to on other boards has to do with simple mods > of one or two input signals, typically MAP and sometimes TPS. If you > understand the "sanity check" abilities of current OBD-II controllers you > will understand why that sort of tuning approach will achieve only limited > and short-term success. > > Bob >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:18 EST