Re: Dyno Results

From: Josh Battles (jbattles@bankfinancial.com)
Date: Tue May 06 2003 - 17:41:07 EDT


I don't know... I backed on, told him it was a 3.9L with 3.55 gears. He
did the rest. All the pulls were in 2nd gear up to like 5400rpm's.
Whatever I know about it is on the sheets on my site. What does having the
rotation set at 720 mean/have to do with it? I really haven't spent too
much time on a dyno to know...

-- 
- Josh
Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L

<bernd@texas.net> wrote in message news:200305062116.h46LGg101956@mail2.aus1.texas.net... > > It's a little bit low...but my old V6 engine came in at 143RWHP. Did the dyno > operator have the rotation set at 720? > > - Bernd > > > > > > > Josh Battles wrote: > > > > >For all that are interested, I took my truck to the Chicagoland Mopar > > >Connection Dyno Day this past Sunday. I had a blast, there was all sorts of > > >sweet Mopar muscle there! Thanks to Chad Evans for inviting me! Here's a > > >link... www.geocities.com/lenny187/dyno.html let me know what you think. > > > > > > > > > > > 130 hp? That sounds low to me. I took my 96 3.9 out to the track one > > night. Did 17.2 in the 1/4 and scaled it at 3980 lbs. Run that through > > some equations and I get about 154 hp at the wheels. > > > > -- > > -Droo > >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:18 EST