would pulling in second gear effect my readings? I would assume (i know how
this breaks down...) that the dyno tech wouldn't have pulled in second if it
was going to be detrimental to my numbers.
-- - Josh Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L""Bernd D. Ratsch"" <bernd@texas.net> wrote in message news:001401c31434$c1074580$090aa8c0@homenet.com... > > Odd-Fire V6 - signal gets "wierded out" - sometime incorrect readings. > > You should have pulled in 3rd gear (automatic) as it's a 1:1 ratio. > > - Bernd > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net > [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Josh > Battles > Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 3:41 PM > To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net > Subject: Re: DML: Dyno Results > > > > I don't know... I backed on, told him it was a 3.9L with 3.55 gears. > He did the rest. All the pulls were in 2nd gear up to like 5400rpm's. > Whatever I know about it is on the sheets on my site. What does having > the rotation set at 720 mean/have to do with it? I really haven't spent > too much time on a dyno to know... > > -- > - Josh > Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L > > > <bernd@texas.net> wrote in message > news:200305062116.h46LGg101956@mail2.aus1.texas.net... > > > > It's a little bit low...but my old V6 engine came in at 143RWHP. Did > > the > dyno > > operator have the rotation set at 720? > > > > - Bernd > > > > > > > > > > > Josh Battles wrote: > > > > > > >For all that are interested, I took my truck to the Chicagoland > > > >Mopar Connection Dyno Day this past Sunday. I had a blast, there > > > >was all > sorts of > > > >sweet Mopar muscle there! Thanks to Chad Evans for inviting me! > Here's a > > > >link... www.geocities.com/lenny187/dyno.html let me know what you > think. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 130 hp? That sounds low to me. I took my 96 3.9 out to the track one > > > > night. Did 17.2 in the 1/4 and scaled it at 3980 lbs. Run that > > > through some equations and I get about 154 hp at the wheels. > > > > > > -- > > > -Droo > > > > > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:18 EST