That seems like some weird logic to me... If trucks DO more damage, then do
they sustain as much damage as cars do? If trucks GET more damaged in
accidents than maybe the rate increase _might_ make a little more sense,
however if truck can take more of a beating then maybe the insurance
companies should be giving us a $50 credit (c:
Brian
""Josh Battles"" <jbattles@bankfinancial.com> wrote in message
news:bb048j$suf$1@bent.twistedbits.net...
>
> Hey, I got my renewal for insurance on my Dak last week and noticed that
my
> premium went up by like $50/year due to some bogus "truck rate increase"
> because "trucks do more damage in accidents than cars" according to my
> agent. Did anyone else experience anything like this??? I just want to
> make sure they're not jackin' my rates unjustly.
>
> --
> - Josh
> Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:21 EST