Believe me I've shopped around like you wouldn't believe, and SF is actually
one of the cheapest to insure me on my Dak. I've even got a $500
deductible. Believe me I know I'm getting drydocked here, but with every
other major carrier being more expensive than SF, I just don't feel
comfortable switching to a no-name insurance or paying more. Believe me,
with my driving record, you wouldn't either. I *should* be losing one of
the accident surcharges on my premium at the next renewal time as well, that
will shave about $75 off of each month. (crossing fingers)
-- - Josh Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L"Danny Burrows" <havenx@ksni.net> wrote in message news:3ED461B6.3020802@ksni.net... > > I think your getting screwed, trucks are almost always cheaper to insure > than a car. I would price other places. > They also go by theft rate.... I don't think Dakotas are stoled that > much so that could not be it. > Ask your insurence ppl some questions dude > > Chad Evans wrote: > > >I havent experienced that at all! > > > >the only thing I have experienced is getting dropped by my insurance! > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Josh Battles" <jbattles@bankfinancial.com> > >To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net> > >Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 11:36 AM > >Subject: DML: insurance? > > > > > >>Hey, I got my renewal for insurance on my Dak last week and noticed that > >> > >my > > > >>premium went up by like $50/year due to some bogus "truck rate increase" > >>because "trucks do more damage in accidents than cars" according to my > >>agent. Did anyone else experience anything like this??? I just want to > >>make sure they're not jackin' my rates unjustly. > >> > >>-- > >>- Josh > >>Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:21 EST