Yup...but a little harder to use (no simple "plug, click, and go").
The Dyno graph looks like a PowerPoint Presentation rather than from an
actual dyno file. It's, more than likely, accurate for their test
vehicle. Hopefully, they'll "CYA" and post it as "up to" specs. If
they're correct...not bad at all for just a simple programmer.
- Bernd
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Bob Mankin
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 6:00 PM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: DML: Re: Re: Re: Superchips Dyno Results
Which part of 18+% HP and torque improvement all by itself would you be
ojecting to? Do you know if any other parts in that price range that
will offer that kind of pickup?
$16.25/HP looks pretty good to me for a V6
Bob
"Josh Battles" <jbattles@bankfinancial.com> wrote in message
news:bb39d8$n8c$1@bent.twistedbits.net...
>
> Hopefully I'm reading this wrong b/c it looks like they went from
> 160->190 FT# TQ and 110->130 HP... That seems a little weak to me, my
> V6 dynoed at 130 HP and about 180 FT# TQ just about stock with a trans
> that was filled
to
> the gills with extra fluid.... My curves looked nicer than theirs
> too.
:-)
>
> Is it me and that I'm reading this wrong or what? Bernd, Ray? What's
> the real deal here? I've been thinking about picking this device up
> thru Chad and this may have changed my mind.
>
> --
> - Josh
> Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
>
>
> ""Chris Hogan"" <chogan@logikos.com> wrote in message
> news:817531784725D411BB9F00508BC97CDC01177602@clavius.logikos.com...
> >
> > ...I asked for some dyno results from Superchips. Here's what they
> > sent
> me for the 3.9L automatic.
> >
> > http://mywebpages.comcast.net/chogan68/Truck/Superchips.pdf
> >
> > Chris
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:22 EST