Really??? That's a little dissapointing, they had told me the program was
fully customizable.
-- - Josh Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L""Chris Hogan"" <chogan@logikos.com> wrote in message news:817531784725D411BB9F00508BC97CDC02D708@clavius.logikos.com... > > FYI, the dyno results they sent were in an Excel file. I printed it to .pdf to post it. > > Dunno why they didn't send "real" dyno results. > > I'll probably order one since I can always eBay it if I don't think it's worth it. I'm not going to pay for dyno time, though (unless everyone wants to chip in ;) ...I'll just see how it "feels". > > I was hoping for a few more options with this programmer. Superchips confirmed that there was one (they called it "light performance") program included and that none of the parameters were adjustable. I guess that's to keep you from destroying your engine... > > Also, you can put the stock program back with the programmer. > > Chris > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bernd D. Ratsch [mailto:bernd@texas.net] > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 8:36 PM > To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net > Subject: DML: RE: Re: Re: Re: Superchips Dyno Results > > > > Yup...but a little harder to use (no simple "plug, click, and go"). > > The Dyno graph looks like a PowerPoint Presentation rather than from an > actual dyno file. It's, more than likely, accurate for their test > vehicle. Hopefully, they'll "CYA" and post it as "up to" specs. If > they're correct...not bad at all for just a simple programmer. > > - Bernd > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net > [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Bob Mankin > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 6:00 PM > To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net > Subject: DML: Re: Re: Re: Superchips Dyno Results > > > > Which part of 18+% HP and torque improvement all by itself would you be > ojecting to? Do you know if any other parts in that price range that > will offer that kind of pickup? > > $16.25/HP looks pretty good to me for a V6 > > Bob > > "Josh Battles" <jbattles@bankfinancial.com> wrote in message > news:bb39d8$n8c$1@bent.twistedbits.net... > > > > Hopefully I'm reading this wrong b/c it looks like they went from > > 160->190 FT# TQ and 110->130 HP... That seems a little weak to me, my > > > V6 dynoed at 130 HP and about 180 FT# TQ just about stock with a trans > > > that was filled > to > > the gills with extra fluid.... My curves looked nicer than theirs > > too. > :-) > > > > Is it me and that I'm reading this wrong or what? Bernd, Ray? What's > > > the real deal here? I've been thinking about picking this device up > > thru Chad and this may have changed my mind. > > > > -- > > - Josh > > Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L > > > > > > ""Chris Hogan"" <chogan@logikos.com> wrote in message > > news:817531784725D411BB9F00508BC97CDC01177602@clavius.logikos.com... > > > > > > ...I asked for some dyno results from Superchips. Here's what they > > > sent > > me for the 3.9L automatic. > > > > > > http://mywebpages.comcast.net/chogan68/Truck/Superchips.pdf > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:22 EST