Re: Diffrence between...

From: Josh Battles (jbattles@bankfinancial.com)
Date: Thu Jun 05 2003 - 16:38:12 EDT


I too would love to bag my truck... I just can't get over that pricetag
either though. I think I'd rather just go fast with the setup that I've got
now, it's low enough for me. Besides, I don't want to have to have my wheel
wells massaged, my frame notched, etc... Besides, if i bagged it, it'd have
to get body dropped, an inch or two taken out of the roof, and everything
would need to be shaved and painted. I don't have the money for that....

-- 
- Josh
Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L

""Brian Fitchett"" <fitchett@chem.utah.edu> wrote in message news:bbo8sm$23c$1@bent.twistedbits.net... > > I have been toying with the idea of air bagging the whole thing for a total > drop of 5-6 up front and 8-10 in the rear, of course while its sitting > probably about 4-6 when driving. however it is prohibitively expensive. > with about $2000 in parts alone, not to mention installation. either that > or putting the adjustable shakles in the rear from 3-5 inches with 2" > springs and 2" control arms up front which is a little more affordable. But > this could all be a pipe dream..... > > Brian > > ""Josh Battles"" <jbattles@bankfinancial.com> wrote in message > news:bbo5dn$p5t$1@bent.twistedbits.net... > > > > Got any pictures??? I'd like to see what the gen III looks like a little > > lower than mine.... > > > > -- > > - Josh > > Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L > > > > > > <RCX2020@aol.com> wrote in message > > news:3CC99218.5672A159.0017B3DD@aol.com... > > > > > > I lowered my 01 Quad Cab with shackles and hangers about 4 1/2 inches. > > > I am happy with it. It does however ride alittle rougher, and > occasionally > > bottom out over large dips. I'm considering adding helper springs to > lesson > > the bottoming out. All in all I am very pleased. The truck looks great and > > corners and handles a lot better. > > > > > >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:26 EST