"Droo" <03dakotaCC4.7_4x4@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:oprq092fpk91nx7n@smtp.comcast.net...
>
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 23:06:47 -0500, Josh Battles
> <jbattles@bankfinancial.com> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > Yeah...they were gonna give me a sweet rate on that $10k... I just
didn't
> > want to finance it. I had the $19k for the truck in my account, I was
> > going
> > to write a check... The only reason that I had a problem is because the
> > amount I wanted to finance was under the minimum finance amount for that
> > dealership and my age so I purchased the truck I went there to buy
> > instead
> > of the R/T. I guess I should have clarified on that one.... I'm with
> > Andy
> > though. With all the special deals that the dealerhips have going on
for
> > financing, they're usually WAAAY under the rate a bank/CU can give you.
> > I
> > work for a bank and less than 5% of our loans are for vehicles... (I ran
> > the
> > report today for a user, that's the only reason that I know.)
> >
>
> I took the $3000 cash back over 0.0% from the dealer. Came out cheaper
that
> way.
>
> --
> -Droo
> Email: 03dakotaCC4.7_4x4@comcast.net
Yes, but I bought my truck in May of 2000. There were no such deals then.
And I didn't mean that our loans for vehicles are 5%, I meant that out of
our total loan customer base less than 5% is for vehicles...
-- - Josh Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:28 EST