Re: Re: RE: Re: 3.9 vs 5.2 radiator

From: andy levy (andylevy@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Jun 24 2003 - 00:22:25 EDT

Next message: andy levy: "Re: RE: What's this wire?"
Previous message: andy levy: "Re: DML BBQ 2003"
In reply to: Mike Meyerhoff: "Re: RE: Re: 3.9 vs 5.2 radiator"
Next in thread: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: Re: RE: Re: 3.9 vs 5.2 radiator"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Mike Meyerhoff wrote:
> The FSM listed the coolant needed as more for the 5.2 so I was hoping it
> came with a bigger radiator and I'd be able to go dig one up as an upgrade.
> Oh well.

Larger block, more volume for the coolant to fill.

-- -andy

http://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/ --- andylevy@yahoo.com -------------------------------------------- "Whatever Adam does, do the opposite and you'll be fine" -Bob Tom --------------------------------------------

Next message: andy levy: "Re: RE: What's this wire?"
Previous message: andy levy: "Re: DML BBQ 2003"
In reply to: Mike Meyerhoff: "Re: RE: Re: 3.9 vs 5.2 radiator"
Next in thread: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: Re: RE: Re: 3.9 vs 5.2 radiator"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:29 EST