The FSM listed the coolant needed as more for the 5.2 so I was hoping it
came with a bigger radiator and I'd be able to go dig one up as an upgrade.
Oh well.
The good news is that any 3.9/5.2 can have the core redone and add a row to
improve cooling. I might do that since a 3"x6" area of fins on my 92 have
corroded away somehow.
Thanks guys
mm
>
> Yup...same one.
>
> - Bernd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Jim Miller
> WB5OXQ
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:58 PM
> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> Subject: DML: Re: 3.9 vs 5.2 radiator
>
>
>
> In the radiator catalog it calls for the same radiator.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Meyerhoff" <mike@mypants.org>
> To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:34 PM
> Subject: DML: 3.9 vs 5.2 radiator
>
>
> >
> > I noticed on my 92s 3.9 that there is extra space between the tanks
> > like there could be an extra row added to the core.
> >
> > Does the 5.2 have an extra row over the 3.9?
> >
> > mm
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:29 EST