Re: Carlisle ALL-Chrysler show

• Next message: Bob Tom: "Re: Re: RE: Re: toyota s-runner threat to r/t"
• Previous message: greg conner: "Re: Carlisle DML Winners"
• In reply to: andy levy: "Re: Carlisle ALL-Chrysler show"
• Next in thread: jon@dakota-truck.net: "Re: Carlisle ALL-Chrysler show"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 23:49:53 andy levy wrote:
>
>> He said "up to 96", not "96 and up"... which one was it?
>>
> You're right, I just wasn't reading properly.

No problem, I just wasn't sure how they had set up the classes. I know
they've messed it up in the past. From Jon's post, it sounds like they're
getting better, but still have some issues to figure out. I'm not sure
why they needed separate classes for 4x4 and 2wd, but whatever.

-- 
Jason Bleazard  http://www.bleazard.net  Toronto, Ontario
his:  '95 Dakota Sport 4x4, 3.9 V6, 5spd, Reg. Cab, white
hers: '01 Dakota Sport 4x4, 4.7 V8, Auto, Quad Cab, black
Didn't you read the disclaimer?  http://www.they.com/disclaimer

• Next message: Bob Tom: "Re: Re: RE: Re: toyota s-runner threat to r/t"
• Previous message: greg conner: "Re: Carlisle DML Winners"
• In reply to: andy levy: "Re: Carlisle ALL-Chrysler show"
• Next in thread: jon@dakota-truck.net: "Re: Carlisle ALL-Chrysler show"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:37 EST