RE: Re: RE: Durango Ball Joint complaint

From: Rick Barnes (barnesrv@comcast.net)
Date: Wed Jul 23 2003 - 10:40:54 EDT


It took long enough for someone to realize that the ball joints were useless
in the Durangos and Dakotas...

Rascal

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Sam Perez
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 10:30 AM
To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
Subject: DML: Re: RE: Durango Ball Joint complaint

Thanks Rich
lets all Gen III 'ers keep our fingers crossed.

-- 
Sam Perez

""Wisotzkey, Rich"" <Rich.Wisotzkey@gd-ns.com> wrote in message news:3BDD58DB53320C4D91038B11445B77625395D3@CHNTEXCHANGE.chnt.gd-ns.com... > > Don't know if it will help, but I just emailed NHTSA to bring the Dakota > ball joint issue to their attention as well. Who knows, maybe it will help > all of you Gen-III owners down the road. Here's their website if you're > interested. > http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/toc.html > > I didn't get a chance to peruse all their reports, but I did see they were > investigating the '95-'95 Dakota's for frame cracks. First I heard anything > about this. Anyone else??? > Rich - Ashburn, VA > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gabriel A. Couriel [mailto:gcouriel@bellsouth.net] > Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 1:29 AM > To: DML > Subject: DML: Durango Ball Joint complaint > > > > my mom saw this on TV tonight. seems this ball joint issue has gotten > serious. > > http://www.nbc6.net/automotive/2349258/detail.html > > and i just finished putting one on my driver's side. > > Gabe Couriel



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:39 EST