It's not fishy at all. Just kept quiet at the dealerships....guess a
lot of people finally got fed up.
- Bernd
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of DaPurpleRT
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:37 PM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: Re: DML: Ouch...this is gonna hurt (sales/quality)
Hmm, how could a problem pop up just in Durangos when the 318 Mag has
been around for over a decade?
Sounds very fishy to me.......
-Ryan
----- Original Message -----
From: <B1LLYW@aol.com>
To: <aol@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: DML: Ouch...this is gonna hurt (sales/quality)
>
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 7/28/2003 8:57:09 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> bernd@texas.net writes:
>
>
> > http://www.consumeraffairs.com/automotive/dodge_dur_oil.html
> >
> >
>
> It's not all the 4.7 though. I only read partially into the article
> and
they
> were citing failures on three '99 Durangos - which had the 318. The
> 4.7 wasn't in the Durango in '99.
>
> Bill White - http://www.bionicdodge.com
>
> '03 Ram 1500 QC 4x4 Hemi Off-Road
> '95 Dakota CC 4x2, SLT - under construction
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:40 EST