when you are talking about the average street car, this doesnt make sense to
me at all. the majority of vehicles arent going to have major problems
until after the warranty is gone, unless someone just didnt change their oil
when needed... at which point i really doubt the warranty would cover it.
dont get me wrong, i like mobil 1 and i use it in every vehicle i have/have
had. its just that everything i have read on this debate so far(from both
sides) is based on speculation of what someone in a company might have been
thinking when a decision was made.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gabriel A. Couriel" <gcouriel@bellsouth.net>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 8:29 PM
Subject: RE: DML: RE: Amsoil -Info
>
> alright. DC posted a $6 billion loss last year. when it was just
Chrysler,
> they were posting gains, however, they STILL used Mobil 1. also, under
> chrysler, there is only one car with factory-equiped synthetic oil (Dodge
> Viper). at the limited quantities produced, it wouldn't make sense for
> chrysler to equip an $80,000 car with a "cheaper oil" if it wasn't up to
the
> task of protecting the vehicle. what would cost more, the cost of
replacing
> hundreds of ultra-expensive engines because of oil failure, or an extra
> $.55/quart for "AMSOIL"??? do a cost-benefit analysis. all the major
> corporations have, and it is more COST EFFECTIVE to use Mobil 1 to protect
> their street cars and racers than it is to use AMSOIL. if Mobil 1 is good
> for Ferrari, Lambo, Dodge, Chevy, etc., then it's good enough for my
Dakota.
> and more to the point, always take information with a grain of salt; when
it
> come's to AMSOIL, i take it with a lot!
>
> Gabe Couriel
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net]On Behalf Of droo
> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 5:37 PM
> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> Subject: Re: DML: RE: Amsoil -Info
>
>
>
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 17:23:53 -0400, Rick Barnes <barnesrv@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > TOTAL BS...you cannot make me believe they will prefer the (so-called),
> > superiority of Amsoil over Mobil One, (that's fiction), for 50 cents.
If
> > you want to believe that they will save 50 cents on the price of a
> > Corvette
> > or Viper, you gotta be smoking something and whatever it is, pass the
> > bong
> > please! No way Amsoils spends more than Mobil One on development
either.
> >
> >
>
> Are you serious? DC posted a $6 billion loss last year. They cut every
> little thing out of the dakota to save money. Every cent counts when it
> comes to cost cutting.
>
> --
> -Droo
>
> http://www.grandroyal.org/dakota
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:46:59 EST