Re: Info On New Dak

From: Aaron Wyse (awyse@sw.rr.com)
Date: Fri Oct 03 2003 - 19:05:38 EDT


    Nope, that means it should be the same brakes & rattle and pop prone Gen
III chassis, No offense to you GenIII guys out there; but someone is always
talking about needing to replace bushings, shocks, brakes or some other
components that really should last more than 20K miles or so.
    I just feel that the GenIII's underpinnings seem like they were a rushed
in design stages. If they're making that many changes for a GenIV; Then
wouldn't it have actually been cheaper to actually share platforms with the
Durango. That way, all they'd have had to do was blend a truck box back
into it; and put a heavier leaf spring rear suspension under it.
Just my $0.02
Aaron Wyse
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Downing" <ded74@yahoo.com>
To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 10:20 AM
Subject: DML: Re: Info On New Dak

>
> > Hank L. on the DiRT list posted this. I thought the Dak guys might want
> to
> > see it.
> >
> > http://info.detnews.com/autosinsider/sneakpeek/index.cfm
> >
> > Bill White - http://www.bionicdodge.com
>
> I wonder if this "carrying over" means that it's not getting the new
> hydroformed (read: lighter) frame? Not that the weight will matter much
if
> it comes out looking like the new Durango :(
>
> -Dave
> '02 FR RC R/T
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:02 EST