RE: Re: RE: Re: SRT-10 Pics

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Fri Oct 24 2003 - 06:52:53 EDT


It is.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Jim Miller
WB5OXQ
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:40 PM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: DML: Re: RE: Re: SRT-10 Pics

I was under the impression that it IS functional!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernd D. Ratsch" <bernd@texas.net>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:17 PM
Subject: DML: RE: Re: SRT-10 Pics

>
> The tail is removable. Actually looks nice on that truck. :)
>
> - Bernd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Mike
Meyerhoff
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 7:22 PM
> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> Subject: DML: Re: SRT-10 Pics
>
>
>
> NOOOOO why did they have to put that stupid whale tail on there.
> NOOOOOO
>
> The sweetest appearance thing the prototype had was the bed cover with
> the built in spoiler that matched the body curves perfect. And they
> replaced
it
> with that. :(
>
> mm
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bernd D. Ratsch" <bernd@texas.net>
> To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 6:05 PM
> Subject: DML: SRT-10 Pics
>
>
> >
> >
> > Yes...we had them in the shop and were working on them (clutches,
> > P/S
> pump,
> > tires).
> >
> > More pics here:
> http://lonestar.texas.net/~bernd/Photos/Chassis/TruckPics/
> >
> > - Bernd
> > (And they're VERY capable of 140+) ;)
> >
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:04 EST