> unless you're a lot farther north than me, it ain't that cold yet.
> here north of the twin cities, no one is driving on the lakes yet, and
> a buddy of mine didn't head up to Mile Lacs this past weekend b/c they
I'm in St. Paul. I know it's not that cold out. However, at the end of
January, we usually get our coldest temps and when I'm starting in the
morning, it's usually 5:00am, which usually has a temperature pretty close
to the overnight lows. Hence the 3-4 weeks from now comment.
> I've always noticed a winter boost, before and after the intake. also
> remember that more of the benefit of a cold air intake (IMO) is that
> it's freer flowing. the air probably isn't that much cooler at the
> intake, but it spends less time heating up before it gets to the
> throttle body, and more of it can make the trip more quickly. My
> personal experience points to the freer flow as being the primary
> benefit, and the air temp as a secondary benefit.
> but of course I might be full of crap too. it's been known to happen.
Are there any comparisons of CFM between factory, K&N factory fit (what
I've got installed) and a full-blown cold-air intake? I did notice a
change when I put in the K&N, but the old filter was also pretty dirty
when I installed it (just after I bought it).
> --
> Mike Maskalans <http://mike.tepidcola.com/dodge/>
> '98 Dakota CC 0x4 318 '84 RamCharger 4x4 360
> mobile.612.618.4652 campus.585.274.2246 fax.360.364.3930
>
-- J Wynia Pragmapool, Inc. www.pragmapool.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 06 2004 - 11:47:13 EST