B1LLYW@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 1/3/2004 1:35:04 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> fasstdak@hotmail.com writes:
>
>
>
>>The choice is yours as to whom you wish to believe. Do you prefer
>>"advertised" gains, "butt dyno" claims, tire spinning claims or documented
>>on track results? I just feel it's important to give all this marketing
>>hype a reality check from time to time. Your wallet may thank me.... :-)
>>
>
>
> How about flow benches and dyno tests of the non-butt variety? I've nothing
> against the Fastmans tb's but F&B has a better product. It's the same thing
> I've been saying for several years, long before I was a "vendor".
1) Numbers in an isolation chamber.
2) Numbers at the end of the 1/4 mile.
The product with supposed better results on #1 above did not yield the
best results on #2 for Ray. Therefore it was not the better product for him
Sorry Bill, but one size does *not* fit all. If Ray has the track
results that prove that Fastman's TB did better for him than the F&B,
you can't tell him that the F&B is the better product for his needs -
and therefore it is not the universally better unit.
-- -andyhttp://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/dakota - andy-dml@levyclan.us -------------------------------------------- "Whatever Adam does, do the opposite and you'll be fine" -Bob Tom --------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 01 2004 - 16:29:48 EST