wouldn't a 44RE or 46RE work in place of his stock 42?
Gabe Couriel
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net]On Behalf Of
B1LLYW@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:14 AM
To: aol@dakota-truck.net
Subject: Re: DML: Warranty Trouble with Supercharger and other mods?
In a message dated 1/7/2004 10:12:10 AM Eastern Standard Time,
kenneth@berntsen.cc writes:
> They just said it would not becovere dbecause
> >> of the
> >> Supercharger. i told them they had to prove that the SC caused the
> >> problem
> >> directly.
> >>
> >> What I need:
> >>
> >> Examples of past experiences.
> >> Special terms or words to use to persuade them.
> >> Anything LEgal on my side.
> >>
> >> thanks
> >>
> >> Pete
> >> NY
>
I'm not sure the Magnuson-Moss act applies to extended warranties. And a
blower will definitely put more stress on the drivetrain - there's no way
around
that. I think you might be stuck on this one.
Bill White - KRC Performance
'95 Dakota CC 4x2 - 408 is done, truck isn't
'03 Ram 1500 QC 4x4 Hemi Off-Road
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 01 2004 - 16:29:49 EST