Re: replacing timing chain on 1998 dakota 2.5 liter

From: Tony Troidl (ttroidl@bluefrognet.net)
Date: Mon Jan 12 2004 - 23:02:41 EST


 Really?

 My '97 had 180K before I replaced it, and it wasn't even that bad then????

what kind of oil do you use????

VERY easy to replace, kit at Autozone with chain and gears was like $16 plus
the gasket set was maybe $15

it was not hard to replace at all...

Tony.
----- Original Message -----
From: KenCo <ken@kencofish.com>
To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: DML: replacing timing chain on 1998 dakota 2.5 liter

>
> Wilbur wrote:
>
> > hey guys,
> >
> > I would like to request your help for a min. Can anyone point me to the
> > procedures to replacing the timing chain and sprockets and/or tensioner
on
> > my 1998 4-cylinder 2.5 liter dak? It was replaced once by the dealer at
a
> > high cost, so I would like to try it this time myself. Is there a good
> > repair manual out there that covers this or a website maybe? thanks
again
> > for your time.
> >
> > Wilbur
> >
> >
>
>
> any of the DIY car manuals are good.
> Chiltons, Hayes etc.
>
>
> do this 1st.
> a quick check is to check the timing (light)
> on the eng. and see if its bouncing around on
> the marks. steady? its fine, bouncy? gone.
>
> next,
> I think theres an adj. for that tensioner,
> check the book for that.
>
>
> can you change a water pump? a few more bolts
> and the timing cover is off. always put a new
> seal in for the crank vibration damp./pulley.
>
>
> after pump and cover is off and its visible
> just turn in direction of rotation until the
> timing marks are lined up.
> take bolts out w/o moving posistion of gears,
> put new on in, adj. tensioner and reassemble.
>
> --
> --
> http://www.kencofish.com Ken Arnold,
> 401-781-9642 cell 401-225-0556
> Importer/Exporter of Goldfish,Koi,rare Predators
> Shipping to legal states/countries only!
> Permalon liners, Oase & Supreme Pondmaster pumps
>
>
> Linux (SuSE 8.2) user #329121
> Please Note: No trees or animals were harmed in the
> sending of this contaminant free message We do concede
> that a signicant number of electrons may have been
> inconvenienced ;)
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 01 2004 - 16:29:49 EST