Re: Re: GAS PRICES

From: Josh Battles (jbattles@bankfinancial.com)
Date: Thu Jan 15 2004 - 09:52:51 EST


It would be nice if I only spent $25 to $35 a week on fuel... I started
school this week at Purdue Calumet... I filled up monday, and then Again
last night. (well, I did some driving for work in there too...) it's been
almost $60 this week on fuel, and this looks to be a continuing trend.

-- 
- Josh
Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
www.geocities.com/lenny187/dakota.html
www.omg-stfu.com

""Karsh"" <karsh@cox.net> wrote in message news:001601c3db68$124ca340$6401a8c0@Karsh... > > Because we aren't buying 25 to 35 dollars of water every week or so. Hehe > > John > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net > [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Jon N. > Benignus > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 7:28 AM > To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net > Subject: Re: DML: Re: GAS PRICES > > > Why aren't there lines waiting to buy bottled WATER at $1.00 (or more) for > SIXTEEN OUNCES??? Milk is well over $3 per gallon. It costs MUCH more to > produce a gallon of gas than a gallon of milk. Or water. Plus, no one > complains about it. > > With the limited refining capacity, due to the environmentalists not > allowing any new refineries to be built, yet we have increased demand, to > produce heating oil in sufficient quanity, some gasoline production has to > shut down and switch to fuel oil. Add to that reserves being at their lowest > since 1975, and you have the classic supply and demand issue. > > Jon > STL MO >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 01 2004 - 16:29:50 EST