Re: recommendation on cat back, or more

From: david.clement@verizon.net
Date: Thu Jan 22 2004 - 17:18:42 EST


In article <4CBFF95D.0CC097BA.0000E7AC@aol.com>, Q8740@aol.com writes:
>
>
> Cat back systems are a waste of money period.!
>
> if you want a chrome tip and a louder muffler , you can certainly spend a lot
>less and end up the same result.
>
>Now if you want HP/TQ on the dodge 4.7, 5.2 or 5.9 we have the best
>performance systems avilable for the Dakota, Ram and Durango
>
> The Tru Dual system from www.gsmotorsports.com is killing the compition with
>results the 4.7 tru dual made 14 rwhp over an existing 3" cat back on stock
>manifolds see dyno link for the results http://www.gsmotorsports.com/dynos.htm
 
Did you test a 3" cat back against a completely stock exhaust? I didn't see
anything in the list of dyno tests that looked like a comparison of the typical
3" cat back to a stock system.

Dave Clement



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 01 2004 - 16:29:51 EST