I never understood the thought process behind 20+
inches of rim and only 2 inches of tire. (I know it
has to be smaller to fit because of the rim, duh) I
just don't get the deal with the big rims. I can
understand bigger rims for bigger tires so you can
off-road. Just seems odd/silly to me. <shrug> To each
his own! :)
Phil
--- Josh Battles <jbattles@bankfinancial.com> wrote:
>
> "Michael Maskalans" <dml@tepidcola.com> wrote in
> message
> >
> >
> > On Jan 21, 2004, at 9:57, Pindell, Timothy wrote:
> >
> > > Speaking of bling-bling, did any of you see the
> show on either TLC or
> > > Discovery channel about Lawyer Malloy's H2 at
> West Coast Customs?
> > > Ridiculous. I like to see the craftsmanship and
> engineering but
> > > spending
> > > that much cash on something like that I can't
> understand. He said he
> > > had to
> > > step down from 26" rims because it was hard to
> steer w/o rub. Poor
> > > thing.
> > > It's a free country I guess...
> >
> > I've got pics from the auto show of an H2 on 28s.
> (finally have them
> > working, except for some reason for my
> RamCharger's pictures. grr.)
> > <http://makeashorterlink.com/?T57F15447>
> > the next pict is the tire size (hit the right
> arrow @ the bottom).
> > --
> > Mike Maskalans
> <http://mike.tepidcola.com/dodge/>
>
> needs moar bettar focus.
>
> but those are huge wheels, and imo, ugly. wheels
> aren't supposed to be that
> big.
>
> --
> - Josh
> Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
> www.geocities.com/lenny187/dakota.html
> www.omg-stfu.com
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 01 2004 - 00:34:02 EST