I donšt mind chrome, but when there's a ton on the front and virtually none
on the rest of the truck....it doesn't look as nice as chrome should.
I think a nice long photoshop session would drive my point home :)
-- Gary Hedlin 98 3.9 RC Sport http://garysdakota.1colony.comOn 2/6/04 9:32 PM, in article mpm820lnfmavcar4kjqjok519mln1ku79g@4ax.com, "Bill Pitz" <dakota@billpitz.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 21:50:49 -0500, ghedlin@theramp.net (Gary Hedlin) > wrote: >> http://www.garyhedlin.com/05DAK.html >> >> I like it. The "spy shots" or any other pics don't do it justice. It looks >> very nice when youre looking at the truck itself. The front end is not bad >> either. If it was painted instead of chrome, it would look better. > > I agree. These make it look a lot better. The only major problem I > have is the tail lights. Someone will make aftermarket ones, though. > > I also agree with you about the chrome. It does not match at all to > have only that part of the bumper done in chrome and have the rest of > the front fascia painted. Just dumb, but nothing that can't be fixed > still. The black truck looks much better in that respect. That would > seriously look good with a nice hood scoop (and I'm not just saying > that because you posted the pics :) ). > > I will probably buy a 2006, maybe the first of the 2007s... I should > be about due for a new truck by then. And it'll give them time to > work out the kinks in the new one. > >> Enjoy the pics!! > > Thanks for the pics, Gary.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 01 2004 - 00:34:02 EST