)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 17:49:55 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Engine life, I run 94 octane here in Canada, my older cars ran on aviation
fuel.
Jim Knox 91 Dak 318LA
----- Original Message -----
From: "andy levy" <andy-dml@levyclan.us>
To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: DML: more power an better mileage???
>
> Craig Rash wrote:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John Bell" <dak@mama.indstate.edu>
> >
> >>So by now you're probably saying, "well gee Uncle John, what's your
> >
> > secret?"
> >
> >>I run a Hypertech programmer at 93 octane level.
> >
> >
> >
> > Maybe I'm missing something here. It would seem that the need to run 93
> > octane and subsequently pay the $.15-.22 more per gallon, would minimize
or
> > negate the gains from getting better mileage. Unless you can run the 93
> > octane program on 87 octane???
>
> I had the same thought. if I'm paying a price premium of 15%, but
> getting 15% better mileage, I've gained....absolutely nothing.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 01 2004 - 00:34:03 EST