Comptency of the person doing the job should be questioned? My 91 Dak was
done at the dealers in 92 with full coverage on all windows, when drying
occurs there is shrinkage which must be allowed for with overlap.
My truck is in DML pictures section K Jim Knox which does show the the rear
window, although not very close!
Jim Knox, 91 Dak 318 LA Original Owner
----- Original Message -----
From: "droo" <03dakotacc4.7_4x4@comcast.net>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: DML: tint on the GenII sliding window
>
> On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 21:58:14 -0600, Justin Sanders
> <greenmachine318@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > I just got my windows tinted on my 95 this past week. I have the sliding
> > window in the back which appearently costs more then anyone else.
> > Anyways the guy said there was no way to tuck the tint anywhere at the
> > bottom right and left windows so now there is a 2mm gap where light can
> > come in. It might not be a big deal to some but i want total darkness
> > when i want it... ya know what i mean. Anyways does this guy know what
> > he's talking about or is that why there wasnt tint originally on my
> > windows? or should i take it back? Anyways he said once it dries i
> > should take some silicon and cover it up? I think ive been had.. lol
> > Well thanks to whoever responds.
> >
>
> I tinted my rear window myself on my 96 when I had it. I dont recall
having
> any kind of gap in those areas. I think maybe in those bottom corners
where
> I didn't do a good job of cutting the tint. And the only other spot was
> around the latch where I cut it back a little too far. It wasn't limo tint
> tho. Same shade as the factory tint on the sides. I don't see why'd he'd
be
> tucking anything.
>
> --
> -Droo
>
> http://www.grandroyal.org/dakota
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 01 2004 - 00:34:04 EST