Re: Re: Re: MP PCM...Hard #'s?

From: Tony Cellana (acellan1@tampabay.rr.com)
Date: Thu Apr 01 2004 - 09:39:53 EST


I was thinking from the OBD-II perspective of the Gen IIIs. Missed the 92
part in the sig. My bad, but the majority of it still holds true.
TonyC

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Smith <jon@fast4x4.net>
To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
<dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
Date: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 9:28 PM
Subject: DML: Re: Re: MP PCM...Hard #'s?

>
>Keep in mind his truck in quesiton is a '92, so the shift points will be
>unaffected by the PCM. Travis, you definitely won't be disapointed with
>it, remember what Tony pointed out concerning the premium gas. You will
not
>be able to run 87 with much success (lots of pinging), but it's only ~$4
>extra per fillup.
>
>-Jon Smith
>
>
>IMO the PCM works best with other mods. Without them, you won't see much
>improvement. And then therte is the extra 20 cents or so per gallon since
>the timing is bumped and premium is almost always needed.
>
>A MP PCM will get you more timing, higher shift points, a/c cutout at WOT,
>higher rev limit, remove speed governor. That's about it.
>
>TonyC
>
>
>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 01 2004 - 12:00:16 EDT