Different idea - have some parts already laying around - need to "fab up"
the rest.
- Bernd
----- Original Message -----
From: "Josh Battles" <jbattles@bankfinancial.com>
To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: DML: "Found" 3 MPG
>
> why not? blown up?
>
> --
> - Josh
> Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
> www.geocities.com/lenny187/dakota.html
> www.omg-stfu.com
>
>
> ""Bernd D. Ratsch"" <fasstdak@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:BAY9-DAV24dTcjJxWY50003cfbe@hotmail.com...
> >
> > Mine isn't blown anymore.
> >
> > - Bernd
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Josh Battles" <jbattles@bankfinancial.com>
> > To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
> > Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 10:01 AM
> > Subject: Re: DML: "Found" 3 MPG
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I've found that the people I know what forced induction vehicles get
way
> > > better mileage on the highway and way worse mileage in the city. The
> way
> > we
> > > figure it is because you like to jump on it more because it pulls
> > stronger.
> > >
> > > My friend just finished his DSM two weeks ago and god is it fast.
He's
> > > managed to go through so much fuel though it's not funny. He's
looking
> at
> > > about 5 - 7 mpg under boost around town. He was still able to pull
off
> > > about 30 mpg on the highway though. 22# is definately a LOT of fun.
> > >
> > > --
> > > - Josh
> > > Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
> > > www.geocities.com/lenny187/dakota.html
> > > www.omg-stfu.com
> > >
> > >
> > > ""Bernd D. Ratsch"" <fasstdak@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:BAY9-DAV50g6pgiBy7r00002838@hotmail.com...
> > > >
> > > > Last few times to Houston, Dallas, or San Antonio - 20-21mpg
(85-90mph
> > > with
> > > > A/C on). Just City driving without any highway trips (or just short
> > > > bursts) - yech - 13-14mpg.
> > > >
> > > > - Bernd
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Josh Battles" <jbattles@bankfinancial.com>
> > > > To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
> > > > Sent: Monday, April 26, 2004 9:03 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: DML: "Found" 3 MPG
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On my round trip to the BBQ I managed to average 23.7mpg, and I
was
> > > > > definately above 70mph.
> > > > >
> > > > > I routinely get 17 - 19 mpg just driving around town.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > - Josh
> > > > > Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
> > > > > www.geocities.com/lenny187/dakota.html
> > > > > www.omg-stfu.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "James" <sixpack_dak@rogers.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:5.1.0.14.0.20040426065754.0254cac8@66.185.95.101...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I never get my Dak up above 60/65 mph because I have a trashed
> rear
> > > end,
> > > > > > and I'm still getting crappy milage, I can't slow down too much
> > more!
> > > > > *lol*
> > > > > > But it's mostly because I have a 3.9L that I have the fuel
mileage
> I
> > > do
> > > > > > (15-17mpg). I'd be happy to get that kind of mileage if I had a
> 5.2L
> > > or
> > > > > > 5.9L. I have a friend with a late-model Ram club cab with a 5.9L
> and
> > > he
> > > > > > gets mid 20's out on the highway it's embarassing.
> > > > > > If any one is looking to buy a Dakota, AVOID THE 3.9L at all
> costs!
> > > > Spend
> > > > > > the extra money and get a V-8. When I worked at a DC dealer
almost
> > > every
> > > > > > 3.9L Dak owner complained about the mileage they were getting.
> > > > > > A V-8 will be coming soon for my Dak!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > James
> > > > > > 91 Dak CC 3.9L
> > > > > >
> > > > > > At 05:30 AM 26/04/2004 +0000, you wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >Tip to those who complain of crappy milage (such as myself):
> slow
> > > the
> > > > > > >f$%@ down!! I drove from home back to school and convinced
> myself
> > to
> > > > go
> > > > > > >65 rather than my usual 75. I got passed a lot more and the
trip
> > > took
> > > > a
> > > > > > >little longer but I pulled darn near 19 MPG. Usually I
consider
> 16
> > > > > > >average and 17 good, with 17.7 being the previous record in the
> > 7000
> > > > > miles
> > > > > > >I've put on since late December '03. Did not think 10 MPH
would
> > make
> > > > > such
> > > > > > >a huge difference, but I guess it does! Wish the sweet spot
was
> a
> > > > little
> > > > > > >higher than that, but I'm happy, thats all I can say, lol. I
> guess
> > I
> > > > > > >*wasn't* crazy when I thought it seemed like it barely used gas
> > when
> > > > > going
> > > > > > >55 between smaller towns when I'm at home..shoulda tried this
> > sooner!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Travis
> > > > > > >'92 Dak 5.2 4x4
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
>_________________________________________________________________
> > > > > > >Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from
> > > McAfeeŽ
> > > > > > >Security.
> > http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 01 2004 - 12:00:17 EDT