On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 09:08:08 -0500, Bernd D. Ratsch <fasstdak@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> Hehehehe....tell that to any professional race/stunt-vehicle driver -
> "No,
> you don't have to wear your seatbelt". (Watch/hear their reaction or
> comment
> to that.) ;)
>
> I'll take my chances with wearing my seatbelt - better to break a collar
> bone than your face.
>
> - Bernd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net]
> Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2004 8:36 AM
> To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
> Subject: Re: DML: Why should I "HAVE" to wear a seatbelt?
>
>
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 6/7/2004 10:31 PM, droo wrote:
>
> | First I agree that seat belts do cause injuries. And no one does |
> studies on how often the belts cause a person to be more injured in an |
> impact. Not just from the belts injuring the person, but from holding |
> you in the same place when in certain types of crashes, being tossed | to
> the other side of the car will save you.
>
Ok. This is taken out of context. This was in response to something someone
else was saying last week sometime. I don't recall what that was, but I
wasn't trying to say that not wearing your seatbelt is a better idea.
-- -Droo
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 01 2004 - 00:15:16 EDT