http://www.wai-wetherill.com/products/ymm.cfm - good site to find the part
numbers but does not always list the Mopar number.
http://www.vicic.com.tw/ap-001-Denso.htm - Find the part on the
crossreference chart using the Lester number from above. Click on the
number to get a detailed page on the alternator.
56027913 - 97-98 Dodge 136amp
56027913AB - 99-2000 Dodge 136 amp
Looks like I will have to wait to get my alternator. Printed out a map to
get to the junkyard, turned out there are two streets in Fort Worth with
the same name, on opposite sides of the city. Naturally I went to the wrong
one. Yard was closed before I could get there. Oh well.
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 14:25:12 -0400, Quintin <sauerquint@gci.net> wrote:
>
>
> <kvmac45@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:cgm8iv$v2g$1@bent.twistedbits.net...
> :
> : In article <c1b400c404082619151fe65908@mail.gmail.com>,
> waffle787@gmail.com
> : ("WiLieR[SS]") writes:
> : >
> : >
> : > On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 20:39:04 +0000 (UTC), kvmac45@comcast.net
> : > <kvmac45@comcast.net> wrote:
> : > >
> : > > Will the HO (136 amp) alternator from the 98 Jeep Grand Cherokee,
> : > > Dakota/Durango work on a 1992 GenII 318? From looking at the
> brackets,
> they
> : > > seem to be identical mounts, and the electrical hookups are still
> the
> same
> : as
> : > > what I currently have. I assume the only difference is the pulley.
> If
> it
> : does
> : > > drop straight in do I need to beef up any of my wiring to handle
> the
> : increased
> : > > amps? I currently have the 120, but it is getting a little tired.
> : > >
> : > It should drop in. I just put a 2000 Dakota alt on my Gen-II last
> : > night. It is listed for a 3.9 v-6 and as a 136amp unit. The pulley
> : > is a bit smaller than the original pulley on my 120, but this is a
> : > good thing as it helps it charge better overall since the alt shaft
> : > will spin faster. I replaced the wire from the alt to the power
> : > center way back. I think I did it when I switched from the 90 amp
> to
> : > the 120 I had installed. Either way, I swapped mine out for a 4
> gauge
> : > wire and never looked back. So far my voltage has been great with
> the
> : > new 136. I give it a "part swap difficulty rating" of 1 with 0 being
> : > a light bulb change. So double check those part numbers and if they
> : > are the same (between the jeep alt and the 2000 dakota alt) then you
> : > have a no problem way to get a few more amps to your battery each
> day.
> : >
> : > WiLieR[SS]
> : > www.shamikaserver.com
> :
> : Cool. The part numbers are a little different on the 98 vs. the 2000,
> but
> after
> : 98 they changed the wiring harness on the back and went to a
> plug/socket
> style
> : instead of the locknuts. I am pretty certain that will account for the
> : different part numbers. I doubt they changed the brackets midway in the
> : production cycle and then went back, so I should be OK.
>
> What is that part number? Give us both of them , pretty please.
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 01 2004 - 00:53:42 EDT