Re: Ball joint part number needed - 99 Dak

From: Josh Battles (josh@omg-stfu.com)
Date: Wed Sep 08 2004 - 12:33:39 EDT

Next message: SCDakotaRT@aol.com: "Re: Ball joint part number needed - 99 Dak"
Previous message: Jason Bleazard: "Re: OT: Frances aftermath"
In reply to: SCDakotaRT@aol.com: "Re: Ball joint part number needed - 99 Dak"
Next in thread: Tony Cellana: "Re: Ball joint part number needed - 99 Dak"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

<SCDakotaRT@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> Is it a 2000 2WD?
>
> -Billy

That's all Tony drives. Knowing Tony, the truck in question is probably an
R/T as well.

-- 
- Josh
Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
All facts have been omitted from this post.
www.omg-stfu.com

Next message: SCDakotaRT@aol.com: "Re: Ball joint part number needed - 99 Dak"
Previous message: Jason Bleazard: "Re: OT: Frances aftermath"
In reply to: SCDakotaRT@aol.com: "Re: Ball joint part number needed - 99 Dak"
Next in thread: Tony Cellana: "Re: Ball joint part number needed - 99 Dak"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 11:38:58 EDT