It will be at the southern mopar nats in may. Wasnt together to bring it
with me last may. See ya there . :)
Greg Conner
1996 RC
3.9 hybrid
>From: "Tony Cellana" <acellan1@tampabay.rr.com>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
>Subject: Re: DML: RE: Sixer is not a dirty word.....
>Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 12:35:49 -0400
>
>
>Anything over 350 rwhp is nothing to snivel at. Good luck casting the web
>on a few of the unsuspecting ;-)
>
>TonyC
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: greg conner <dodgeboy93@hotmail.com>
>To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
>Date: Friday, September 24, 2004 9:17 AM
>Subject: Re: DML: RE: Sixer is not a dirty word.....
>
>
>
>rear wheel
>
>Disclaimer: *Progressive stage 400 shot 408's need not apply for biting*
>
>
>
>Greg Conner
>1996 RC
>3.9 hybrid
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Tony Cellana" <acellan1@tampabay.rr.com>
> >Reply-To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> >To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> >Subject: Re: DML: RE: Sixer is not a dirty word.....
> >Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 07:15:51 -0400
> >
> >
> >Crank or RW HP? I might just wander on by and see which gets bitten ;-)
> >TonyC
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: greg conner <dodgeboy93@hotmail.com>
> >To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> >Date: Friday, September 24, 2004 12:35 AM
> >Subject: RE: DML: RE: Sixer is not a dirty word.....
> >
> >
> >
> >And some of us have evil workshops containing 400hp/500ft/lb 11 sec v6's
> >just waitng for a uneducated 4.7 truck to wonder by...... ;)
> >
> >muhaha
> >
> >
> >
> >Greg Conner
> >1996 RC
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: "Bernd D. Ratsch" <fasstdak@hotmail.com>
> > >Reply-To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> > >To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
> > >Subject: DML: RE: Sixer is not a dirty word.....
> > >Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 22:06:11 -0500
> > >
> > >
> > >LOL....hey now, don't take it so hard. We "Sixers" sometimes wonder
>why
> > >we're always seeing the "Eighters" fade into the distance in our rear
> >view
> > >mirrors - being that we're cyndrically challenged (no question on
>that).
> > >;)
> > >
> > >No harm, no foul...just teasin'
> > >
> > >- Bernd
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
> > >[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of steve
> >preston
> > >Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 9:32 PM
> > >To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> > >Subject: DML: Sixer is not a dirty word.....
> > >
> > >
> > >Hey guys and gals! A few days ago I commented on how well my Dak was
> > >running,and benignly compared the occasional "lower end" of it`s
> > >performance
> > >scale(resulting from weather conditions) to a "sixer".
> > >I did not realize at the time I constructed my post that those words
>may
> > >cause pain and hardship to some by the phraseology that was used,and
>that
> > >is
> > >this writer`s fault,and none other. Let me be abundantly
> > >clear: I apologize at this time. The remark was regrettable.
> > >
> > >What I fear may have happened is this:
> > >
> > >The comment could have been inadvertantly seized upon by people who
> >already
> > >may be predisposed to feelings of inadequacy due to being cylindrically
> > >challenged.
> > >And rather than take this into account (the fact that you really have
>to
> > >walk on eggshells with some people, or else feelings will get trampled
>on
> > >and their pride will be crumpled up like a crusty old snot rag),I
> > >unfortunately went full bore with my accolades for my eight-piston Dak.
>I
> > >know now that it was wrong. :)
> > >
> > >I suppose it would be a better world,where all Daks are judged
>according
> >to
> > >the content of their character rather than the burbling cubic
> >displacement
> > >under their skin. Where,instead of merely looking on perhaps as another
> >Dak
> > >has trouble pulling a stump out of the ground,the stouter Dak might
>pull
> >up
> > >alongside and say,"Here,Brother,let me help you with that. And,by the
> >way:
> > >I
> > >love you."
> > >
> > >Friends,let us celebrate the unity we have with our Daks. For there is
> >but
> > >one Dak! It is the 1986-2005 Dodge Dakota 4X4 (if equipped),with power
> > >mirrors (or not),with some kind of differential setup and with a given
> > >number of cylinders. That is what we fight for!
> > >It`s what we love.
> > >
> > >Steve P. (Former proud owner of a 1999 V6 Dak!)
> > > (Now proud owner of a 2001 V8 Dak,but still
> > >lovin` the 3.9`s!) :)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > And when a V8 Dak owner comes along and announces to everyone that
>his
> > >engine is performing superbly,it unfortunately does little to mitigate
> >the
> > >sting that
> > >V6
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________
> > >Do you Yahoo!?
> > >Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
> > >http://vote.yahoo.com
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now!
> >http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
> >
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
>http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now!
http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 11:38:59 EDT