RE: Re: RE: OT: SRT-6 AWD 330 HP Crossfire

From: Stlaurent CIV Steven (steven.stlaurent@usmc.mil)
Date: Mon Oct 04 2004 - 10:47:59 EDT


This motor was designed to handle close to south of 500-lbs of TQ.

The AMG MB tranny in question is the problem. It is no used in MB cars. It maybe the thinking of the SRT to ensure longevity of the powertrain.

--------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Ground Systems, GCE Team
System Test Branch
SE&I Support Division, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, U.S. Marine Corps

Office (760) 725-2506 (DSN: 365)
Cell: (760) 622-9105
"If I had only known, I would have been a locksmith."
- Albert Einstein .

 -----Original Message-----
From: Josh Battles [mailto:josh@omg-stfu.com]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 6:37
To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
Subject: DML: Re: RE: OT: SRT-6 AWD 330 HP Crossfire

""Stlaurent CIV Steven"" <steven.stlaurent@usmc.mil> wrote in message
>
> Old news. This car is for sale already.
>
> It will scoot to 60-MPH in 5.2 seconds. Top end is over 160-MPH. 1/4 mile
low 14s.
>
> However, the 300 SRT is getting a AWD unit also. The 6.1 ltr Hemi produces
433-HP but lacks real TQ due to the MB auto tranny.

Maybe I'm missing something, but how is engine torque output in any way
effected by the transmission? Maybe the numbers at the wheels could be
higher, but the engine's output will remain the same regardless of what
transmission used.

-- 
- Josh
Lowered 2000 Dakota CC 3.9L
Above Statement Not True    ^^^^^
www.omg-stfu.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Nov 01 2004 - 10:47:42 EST