Along with head cc and head gasket thickness.
TonyC
-----Original Message-----
From: James Calder <jCalder3@cfl.rr.com>
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Date: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 7:57 AM
Subject: DML: RE: Re: RE: Re: MP 408
>
>I'm in no way an expert engine builder but isn't compression ratio also
>subject to the piston (flat, dished, domed, location of wrist pin , valve
>releifs, etc.)?
>
>James
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
>[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of madboy
>Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 9:07 PM
>To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>Subject: DML: Re: RE: Re: MP 408
>
>
>Head Chamber CC and gasket thickness will determine compression ...specs
>should read "compression = X with X CC heads. While the Mopar shortblocks
>are prolly fine for a daily driver I have heard they are not suited for
high
>HP.
>
>Josh
>Mad RT
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "James Calder" <jCalder3@cfl.rr.com>
>To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
>Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 5:08 PM
>Subject: DML: RE: Re: MP 408
>
>
>>
>> That what I thought also Tony but these are short blocks so they come
>> without heads and intake anyways. Would the piston be different for a
>lower
>> compression?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
>> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Tony
Cellana
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 7:23 PM
>> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>> Subject: DML: Re: MP 408
>>
>>
>> Carb version will not have a FI intake.
>> Tony
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: James Calder <jCalder3@cfl.rr.com>
>> To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
>> Date: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 7:04 PM
>> Subject: DML: MP 408
>>
>>
>> >
>> >Does anyone know the specifics to this short block #P5007840 MPI 406
>> >beside the stated cast crank and cast pistons. Like compression
ratio...
>> >
>> >What makes MP#P5007841 Stroker "A" Carb a carburator version?
>> >
>> >Thanks for any insight.
>> >James
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Nov 01 2004 - 10:47:42 EST