RE: Subject: Re: 92 Dakota 5.2L 2wd a/c 46rh 176k miles

From: James Calder (jCalder3@cfl.rr.com)
Date: Mon Oct 18 2004 - 14:31:33 EDT


By Mopar PCM, you mean a Mopar Performance PCM and not a stock Mopar PCM,
correct?
How would a '93 318 MP PCM work with a 408?
I'm not sure when the 5.9' Magnums came out. Was it when there was still
OBD I? If so, will a OBD I (same style as my '93) MP PCM work? Or is it
the same as a 318 MP PCM?
Thanks again,
James

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of B1LLYW@aol.com
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 11:59 AM
To: aol@dakota-truck.net
Subject: Re: Subject: Re: DML: 92 Dakota 5.2L 2wd a/c 46rh 176k miles

In a message dated 10/18/2004 11:45:21 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
kvmac45@comcast.net writes:

> FWIW I keep hearing conflicting reports on running a 360
> with a 318 PCM. Some say it works, others say it dosen't. I think the
Mopar
> PCM
> would have the best chance of running a 360 properly

It works just fine the following modifier. '97 and earlier, no problems at
all. '98 and up where the vin number has to be entered into the pcm I have
occasionally heard of problems.

Bill White - KRC Performance

http://www.bionicdodge.com

'03 Ram 1500, RC, Hemi, 4x2, 3.92 LSD
'04 Liberty, 4x4, 3.7, 5 speed, 3.73 LSD



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Nov 01 2004 - 10:47:43 EST