$12,500 is a bit high ($2K-$3k too high). IT is not the performance level
that makes it pricey but the Shelby name. If performance was the only
indicators than a 1987 Mustang LX 5.0 would be worth more than a 1966 Shelby
Mustang GT 350. To be fair, the Shelby name is not important to everyone.
Many if not most people would rather have a 1998 5.2 5-speed Dak. The only
reason I have a 1989 Dak is because it is a Shelby. I am a big fan of the
man. The reason I also have a 2004 Dak Quad Cab is because I love the truck.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Sykes" <mikesykes@cox.net>
To: <dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: DML: Re: 1990 SHELBY DAKOTA FOR SALE
>
>>>I posted an ad on the DML to give a lucky American a chance to own a
> 1990 Shelby Dakota. Instead I get Laughed at. Your loss!<<<
>
> 12 grand for a 15 year old truck? It may be rare, but it ain't $12,000
> rare. I paid less than that for a faster and nicer R/T. I love the premag
> body style, but not THAT much.
>
> not my loss... I'll be keeping my $12,500.
>
> -miggity
> Newport News VA
> 2000 FR R/T CC
>
> "...someone set up us the bomb...."
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Nov 01 2004 - 10:47:43 EST