Re: TQ conv lockup with new belly pan

• Next message: Terrible Tom: "Re: 87-91 Compared to 91-96"
• Previous message: andy levy: "Re: It *is* the bumper!"
• Maybe in reply to: Barry Oliver: "TQ conv lockup with new belly pan"
• Next in thread: jon@dakota-truck.net: "Re: TQ conv lockup with new belly pan"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Barry Oliver wrote:

>
> I just had my belly pan gasket replaced for the second time in 30k miles.

well that blows. I'm glad mine is holding up. the first time it goes I'm
either getting a billet pan or ditching the beer barrel though.

> Now I don't think my Tq converter is locking up. Is there any possible
> correlation between those?

well of course there *shouldn't* be......

to test lockup, try driving a steady highway speed and gently riding the
brakes. if I do this in my truck the converter unlocks and I get a 400 or
so RPM surge. you should also be able to see (in the tach) /feel it
unlock if you turn overdrive on/off while cruising.

--
Mike Maskalans
BTW / P.S. / OT / OMGWTFBBQ -
Anne and I are planning on the weekend of the 19th-21st.  so plan on that
or let us know if it's not going to work out.  we should talk before then
and solidify things.

• Next message: Terrible Tom: "Re: 87-91 Compared to 91-96"
• Previous message: andy levy: "Re: It *is* the bumper!"
• Maybe in reply to: Barry Oliver: "TQ conv lockup with new belly pan"
• Next in thread: jon@dakota-truck.net: "Re: TQ conv lockup with new belly pan"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 01 2005 - 11:47:51 EST