Re: RE: Re: 1.6 vs. 1.7 rr's

Next message: Gary Hedlin: "Re: Roush Magnums (was: SEMA Show 2004 Photos)"
Previous message: Gary Hedlin: "Re: Re: RE: Re: 1.6 vs. 1.7 rr's"
In reply to: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: Re: 1.6 vs. 1.7 rr's"
Next in thread: Gary Hedlin: "Re: Re: RE: Re: 1.6 vs. 1.7 rr's"
Reply: Gary Hedlin: "Re: Re: RE: Re: 1.6 vs. 1.7 rr's"
Reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: Re: RE: Re: 1.6 vs. 1.7 rr's"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: <A HREF="mailto:dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net?Subject=Re:%20RE:%20Re:%201.6%20vs.%201.7%20rr's&In-Reply-To=&lt;003201c4c9e5$e5bfc2e0$53c20d44@SERVER&gt;">[ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

From: Mike Sykes (mikesykes@cox.net)
Date: Sat Nov 13 2004 - 20:04:30 EST

>>Here's the formula:
(Cam Lift/Rated Rocker Ratio)* New Rocker Ratio
In other words: (.512 / 1.6) * 1.7 = .544<<

aiight... so (.512 / 1.5) x 1.7 = .580 lift That's a ton of lift....

Newport News VA
2000 FR R/T CC

"...someone set up us the bomb...."

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 01 2005 - 11:47:51 EST