Agree, finding the right u joints for my 98 was a real pain...I finally
removed them and just took them to NAPA till we matched them up. None of
the books had the right numbers.
Rascal
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@bent.twistedbits.net] On Behalf Of Steve Mills
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 8:20 PM
To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
Subject: Re: DML: U-Joints...
I thought the rear was the same on my 92 also. I found out the rear is
larger and had to bring it back. Advance Auto had to look it up under a 95
in order to get me the right one.
>From: Terrible Tom <SilverEightynine@aol.com>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
>Subject: Re: DML: U-Joints...
>Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 10:27:30 -0600
>
>
>Bill Day wrote:
>>OK, looks like I need to consider my U-Joint selection and choise for my
>>DAK. I do not have the 3 piece alum. graph. rear driveshat so I am
>>guessing
>>I only need to purchase 4 u-joints? 2 for the front shaft and 2 for the
>>rear... From what I gather on Napas site, the front 2 are different where
>>as the rear 2 are the same part at both ends? Is this corrrect?
>>
>>TIA,
>>
>>Bill Day
>>95 CC v6 3.9L 4wd
>>
>
>
>Call around and check prices and parts. When it comes to chassis parts - I
>would stick with either Dana/Spicer or Moog. I don't care for AZ's own
>brands of chassis parts. However those were exactly what I bought for
>Christine - but due to certain mitigating circumstances - I was never
>really able to see how well the new U-joints hold up heh.
>
>--
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>Attention Infidels: I am your official DBDoMPfIWUMOT!
>Terrible Tom -- AIM & Yahoo Name: SilverEightynine
>http://members.aol.com/silvereightynine/
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 01 2005 - 11:47:52 EST