Re: 1.6 vs. 1.7 rr's

From: Mike Sykes (mikesykes@cox.net)
Date: Wed Nov 17 2004 - 22:12:56 EST

Next message: Mike Sykes: "Re: RE: Re: Head Unit"
Previous message: Mike Sykes: "Re: Re: RE: Have no choice now..."
In reply to: dougmyers@gmail.com: "Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: 1.6 vs. 1.7 rr's"
Next in thread: dougmyers@gmail.com: "Re: 1.6 vs. 1.7 rr's"
Reply: dougmyers@gmail.com: "Re: 1.6 vs. 1.7 rr's"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>Actually, I remember "Project 13's" quite well. The Comp 604 is rated at
>.480"
with 1.5:1 ratio, and .512" with 1.6:1 rockers<<

Man, I wish I coulda' seen what that motor woulda' done...... it was
baaaaaad =)

-miggity
Newport News VA
2000 FR R/T CC

"...someone set up us the bomb...."

Next message: Mike Sykes: "Re: RE: Re: Head Unit"
Previous message: Mike Sykes: "Re: Re: RE: Have no choice now..."
In reply to: dougmyers@gmail.com: "Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: 1.6 vs. 1.7 rr's"
Next in thread: dougmyers@gmail.com: "Re: 1.6 vs. 1.7 rr's"
Reply: dougmyers@gmail.com: "Re: 1.6 vs. 1.7 rr's"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 01 2005 - 11:47:52 EST