Diiiing friiiiies aaaaare dooooooone
>From: Gary Hedlin <garyhedlin@sbcglobal.net>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
>To: dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net
>Subject: Re: DML: movie quality
>Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 23:11:44 -0600
>
>
>On 12/14/04 10:58 PM, in article
>BAY19-F298036FEE17457DDC08CE8C3AD0@phx.gbl,
>""Ronald Taylor"" <scsilverdakdml@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > I'll address this in the order I saw the comments........
> >
> > (1) Due to issues at home here, I had to take my site down and transfer
>the
> > data to my page below to save money on a monthly basis......
> >
> > (2) I e-mailed gary on my reasons and explained in detail why and asked
>for
> > a Bill or invoice for what he had done so I could pay him for services
> > rendered.........his response was that i owed him nothing
> > and he got pissed at me. (I haven't heard from him sense)
>
>Called cuttiing my losses. You wanted to kill the site to cut down on
>expenses, which is fine. I knew what was going on with your personal life,
>so I just let it be. But then when I find out about your engine
>project....and the paint project....and the lift kit..... Well makes me
>feel
>like shit.....
>
> > I've never welched on paying a bill in my life and that Cheap shot was
> > uncalled for and unfair...
>
> Cheap shot......Unfair??? Gee, I'ld like to see how you'd feel if you
>put several hours into something only to have the guy your doing it for
>cancel, and then find out that his reason for canceling was BS
>
>
>--
>
>Gary Hedlin
>www.garyhedlin.com
>2005 Dakota SLT CC 4.7 5spd
>1998 Dakota Sport RC 3.9
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Michael Maskalans <dml@tepidcola.com>
> > Reply-To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> > To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net
> > Subject: DML: movie quality
> > Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 21:53:21 -0500
> >
> >
> >
> > On Dec 14, 2004, at 19:01, Gary Hedlin wrote:
> >
> >> Heres a sample of my work:
> >>
> >> http://garyhedlin.com/temp/rondyno.mov
> >>
> >
> > Looks like Gary beat me to it - but don't let him drop the sound quality
> > that much! Coulda saved just as much by keeping the sample rate up at
>44
> > and going to monaural sound...
> >
> > So I guess I'll continue nitpicking here....
> > I'd assume the original came from a DV camera - you should always keep
>the
> > framerate a nice multiple of the original framerate, and 12 doesn't work
> > nicely with 30. This keeps the result from being jumpy - though in this
> > video you probably wouldn't notice if it was downsampled to 5 fps since
> > there is no action, and then you could have turned down the compression
> > significantly and had a much cleaner product. Titling size is a wee bit
> > small for shrinking the vid to web size too....
> >
> > but whatever - video is better than no video, and we all know how on top
>of
> > the BBQ '03 highlights I've been =D
> > --
> > Mike Maskalans <http://mike.tepidcola.com/dodge/>
> > '98 Dakota SLT 318 4x4 SFA & 35s
> > '84 RamCharger Royale SE 360 4x4 stock
> > mobile.612.618.4652 home.585.935.7129
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's
>FREE!
> > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 01 2005 - 11:48:08 EST