Re: movie quality

From: Gary Hedlin (garyhedlin@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Wed Dec 15 2004 - 00:11:44 EST


On 12/14/04 10:58 PM, in article BAY19-F298036FEE17457DDC08CE8C3AD0@phx.gbl,
""Ronald Taylor"" <scsilverdakdml@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
> I'll address this in the order I saw the comments........
>
> (1) Due to issues at home here, I had to take my site down and transfer the
> data to my page below to save money on a monthly basis......
>
> (2) I e-mailed gary on my reasons and explained in detail why and asked for
> a Bill or invoice for what he had done so I could pay him for services
> rendered.........his response was that i owed him nothing
> and he got pissed at me. (I haven't heard from him sense)

Called cuttiing my losses. You wanted to kill the site to cut down on
expenses, which is fine. I knew what was going on with your personal life,
so I just let it be. But then when I find out about your engine
project....and the paint project....and the lift kit..... Well makes me feel
like shit.....

> I've never welched on paying a bill in my life and that Cheap shot was
> uncalled for and unfair...

    Cheap shot......Unfair??? Gee, I'ld like to see how you'd feel if you
put several hours into something only to have the guy your doing it for
cancel, and then find out that his reason for canceling was BS

-- 

Gary Hedlin www.garyhedlin.com 2005 Dakota SLT CC 4.7 5spd 1998 Dakota Sport RC 3.9

> > > > > From: Michael Maskalans <dml@tepidcola.com> > Reply-To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net > To: dakota-truck@dakota-truck.net > Subject: DML: movie quality > Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 21:53:21 -0500 > > > > On Dec 14, 2004, at 19:01, Gary Hedlin wrote: > >> Heres a sample of my work: >> >> http://garyhedlin.com/temp/rondyno.mov >> > > Looks like Gary beat me to it - but don't let him drop the sound quality > that much! Coulda saved just as much by keeping the sample rate up at 44 > and going to monaural sound... > > So I guess I'll continue nitpicking here.... > I'd assume the original came from a DV camera - you should always keep the > framerate a nice multiple of the original framerate, and 12 doesn't work > nicely with 30. This keeps the result from being jumpy - though in this > video you probably wouldn't notice if it was downsampled to 5 fps since > there is no action, and then you could have turned down the compression > significantly and had a much cleaner product. Titling size is a wee bit > small for shrinking the vid to web size too.... > > but whatever - video is better than no video, and we all know how on top of > the BBQ '03 highlights I've been =D > -- > Mike Maskalans <http://mike.tepidcola.com/dodge/> > '98 Dakota SLT 318 4x4 SFA & 35s > '84 RamCharger Royale SE 360 4x4 stock > mobile.612.618.4652 home.585.935.7129 > > _________________________________________________________________ > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 01 2005 - 11:48:08 EST