Bill,
If I am reading this right, what you are saying is that the Jet chip
gradually "loses" this performance increases over time, because the PCM is
slowly "correcting" for the change in inputs from the Jet programming ??
Now that you mention it, I do seem to recall the initial installation as
being more aggressive. I just thought I was getting used to things and
didn't notice it as much because of daily familiarity with the truck. You've
got me thinking now !!!
Eric Luce
'99 Dak, SLT, CC
5.2L, auto, 2WD
----- Original Message -----
From: <B1LLYW@aol.com>
To: <aol@dakota-truck.net>
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: DML: Mopar PCM question
>
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 12/23/2004 4:35:30 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> ontheluce@adelphia.net writes:
>
>
>> HI. I am curious about something. What performance differences would
>> there
>>
>> be between using the Mopar permance PCM vs. using the Jet Performance
>> "module" (which I currently use) ?? Don't they use a different means of
>> accomplishing the same thing ?? Also, would anyone know if a '98
>> performance PCM is the same thing as one for a '99, all other things
>> being
>> equal (equipment wise) ??? Thanks for your advise in advance, and I am
>> looking forward to hearing the different opinions on this issue. Merry
>> CHRISTmas !!!
>>
>
> The Mopar pcm changes the base programming to improve performance. The
> Jet
> chip is supposed to modify the programming. What happens with the Jet is
> the
> pcm adapts to what it is doing and the gains are minimal if at all. The
> Mopar
> pcm, by changing the base programming, doesn't "lose" it's gains. They
> are
> always there.
>
> Bill White - KRC Performance
>
> http://www.bionicdodge.com
>
> '03 Dakota R/T, CC, Black, Bone Stock
> '04 Liberty, 4x4, 3.7, 5 speed, 3.73 LSD
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 01 2005 - 11:48:09 EST